Thought Leaders
Why AI Automation Isn’t About Replacing Workers—It’s About Scaling Human Potential

As computers and AI emerged in the 1950s and 1960s, Congress held hearings on the potential impact on jobs. Then there was a presidential commission, which created a multi-volume report on the topic. But as unemployment continued to fall, the concerns did as well.
Fast forward to today – and yes, the fears are back. But they seem much more real, especially as AI systems continue to get more intelligent.
Consider a recent study from researchers at Stanford University. Based on millions of payroll records as of July 2025, young workers between the ages of 22-25 suffered a 13% decline in employment since 2022. A heavy concentration of the jobs affected included software engineers and customer service agents.
Even some leaders of major companies are saying that AI will have a major impact on employment. Here’s what Ford CEO Jim Farley had to say about it in July: “Artificial intelligence is gonna replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the U.S.”
In light of all this, it’s only natural that employees are fearing their job prospects. Yet there needs to be caution with the predictions. I think AI automation is less about displacement, more about amplifying human capability. It’s an opportunity to scale the potential of workers.
AI in the Real World: Transformation, Not Displacement
During a recent interview, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman suggested that the role of customer support will disappear. He noted that AI will eliminate phone trees, handle first-contact resolution, scale at 24/7, just to name a few.
All this is certainly true. But it is a big stretch to predict that there will be wholesale displacement of millions of employees.
Rather, a better way to view the impact is on certain categories of the tasks. For example, routine inquiries like cancellations and account lookups will be best handled by AI at scale. But what if you are calling about a highly complex billing error that impacts different services? Or what if your call is about the death of a loved one?
These situations highlight why organizations should not rely on AI alone. Humans are still uniquely qualified for advanced reasoning and empathy. Customers will demand this.
But human support agents will also benefit from assistive AI, like with suggestions, next-best actions, and auto-summarization. Ultimately, AI is about reshaping the role of an employee.
An interesting use case that supports this is from Klarna, which operates a payments and commerce network for more than 111 million active shoppers. In February 2024, the company announced a partnership with OpenAI to build a chatbot for customer support. Within the first month of implementation, the system handled two-thirds of customer interactions and did the work of about 700 full-time agents.
But the company would eventually realize that this technology had major limitations, especially with accuracy. According to a report from Business Insider, Klarna has since redeployed employees to customer support positions.
The CEO and cofounder of the company, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, tweeted this about the change in strategy: “We just had an epiphany: in a world of AI nothing will be as valuable as humans! Ok you can laugh at us for realizing it so late, but we are going to kick off work to allow Klarna to become the best at offering a human to speak to!!!”
Shifting Roles and Skills
AI-assisted programming tools like GitHub Copilot and Cursor have led to real gains in developer productivity. Based on natural language prompts, they can write, debug, and test code. Agentic AI has also made it possible to carry out complex multi-step processes.
But again, it’s likely an exaggeration to say that this will wipe out jobs for developers. This is especially the case for those who develop and maintain applications in the enterprise, which require reliability, scale, security, and compliance. For example, would a bank launch an app – which impacts customer accounts – without a human review?
Definitely not.
Instead, software engineering will become more about systems design and architecture. It will involve having a holistic understanding of an application’s capabilities and how they interact with other applications.
What this means is that companies will need to redefine roles. We’ll see more demand for categories like AI engineers, customer engineers, and forward-deployed engineers. As for entry-level developers, their focus will be less about grinding through frameworks, and more about applying AI tools to real-world use cases.
Preparing the Workforce
Success in navigating AI transformation requires rethinking the traditional approach to onboarding of employees. Employers need to have their own education, which involves case-based learning that has a focus on customer problems. The education must be ongoing too – not a couple weeks of coding drills.
Forward-looking companies that embrace this transition can actually increase hiring, not reduce it. They will also be in a better position to leverage technologies like agentic AI. The result will be much more impactful results, in terms of productivity, innovation, and employee satisfaction.
Conclusion
Fears of job loss are understandable. The headlines can definitely be scary. Yet the greater story is about the transformation and scaling human potential. The fact is that breakthrough technologies have always shifted what work looks like – and AI is no different. The winners will be the companies and workers who learn to embrace augmentation, invest in reskilling, and lean into AI as a force multiplier.












