Best Of
10 Best Databases for Machine Learning & AI
Unite.AI is committed to rigorous editorial standards. We may receive compensation when you click on links to products we review. Please view our affiliate disclosure.

Finding the right database for machine learning and AI projects has become one of the most important infrastructure decisions developers face. Traditional relational databases weren’t designed for the high-dimensional vector embeddings that power modern AI applications like semantic search, recommendation systems, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
Vector databases have emerged as the solution, optimized for storing and querying the numerical representations that ML models produce. Whether you’re building a production RAG pipeline, a similarity search engine, or a recommendation system, choosing the right database can make or break your application’s performance.
We’ve evaluated the leading databases for ML and AI workloads based on performance, scalability, ease of use, and cost. Here are the 10 best options for 2025.
Comparison Table of Best Databases for Machine Learning & AI
| AI Tool | Best For | Price (USD) | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinecone | Enterprise RAG applications | Free + $50/mo | Serverless architecture, hybrid search, SOC 2 compliance |
| Milvus | Self-hosted enterprise scale | Free + $99/mo | Open source, billion-scale vectors, multiple index types |
| Weaviate | Knowledge graph + vectors | Free + $45/mo | Hybrid search, multi-modal support, built-in vectorizers |
| Qdrant | High-performance filtering | Free | Rust-based, payload filtering, gRPC support |
| ChromaDB | Rapid prototyping | Free | Embedded mode, Python-native API, zero config |
| pgvector | PostgreSQL users | Free | PostgreSQL extension, unified queries, ACID compliance |
| MongoDB Atlas | Document + vector unification | Free + $57/mo | Vector search, aggregation pipelines, global clusters |
| Redis | Sub-millisecond latency | Free + $5/mo | In-memory speed, semantic caching, vector sets |
| Elasticsearch | Full-text + vector hybrid | Free + $95/mo | Powerful DSL, built-in embeddings, proven scale |
| Deep Lake | Multi-modal AI data | Free + $995/mo | Images, video, audio storage, version control, data lakes |
1. Pinecone
Pinecone is a fully managed vector database built specifically for machine learning applications at scale. The platform handles billions of vectors with low latency, offering a serverless architecture that eliminates infrastructure management. Companies like Microsoft, Notion, and Shopify rely on Pinecone for production RAG and recommendation systems.
The database excels at hybrid search, combining sparse and dense embeddings for more accurate results. Single-stage filtering delivers fast, precise queries without post-processing delays. With SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001, and HIPAA certifications, Pinecone meets enterprise security requirements out of the box.
Pros and Cons
- Fully managed serverless architecture eliminates infrastructure management overhead
- Handles billions of vectors with consistently low latency at enterprise scale
- Hybrid search combines sparse and dense embeddings for more accurate results
- Single-stage filtering delivers fast, precise queries without post-processing delays
- SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001, and HIPAA certifications meet enterprise security requirements
- Vendor lock-in with no self-hosted option available for data sovereignty needs
- Costs can escalate quickly at high query volumes and large vector counts
- Limited customization options compared to open-source alternatives
- No support for sparse-only indexes or traditional keyword search
- Free tier has restrictive limits on vector count and query throughput
2. Milvus
Milvus is the most popular open-source vector database with over 35,000 GitHub stars, designed for horizontal scaling across billions of vectors. Its cloud-native architecture separates storage, compute, and metadata layers, allowing independent scaling of each component. NVIDIA, IBM, and Salesforce use Milvus in production environments.
The platform supports multiple index types including HNSW, IVF, and DiskANN, plus hybrid search combining vector similarity with scalar filtering. Zilliz Cloud offers a managed version starting at $99/month, while the open-source edition runs free under Apache 2.0. Memory-efficient disk-based storage handles datasets larger than available RAM.
Pros and Cons
- Open source under Apache 2.0 license with 35,000+ GitHub stars and active community
- Cloud-native architecture separates storage, compute, and metadata for independent scaling
- Supports multiple index types including HNSW, IVF, and DiskANN for different use cases
- Memory-efficient disk-based storage handles datasets larger than available RAM
- Hybrid search combines vector similarity with scalar filtering in single queries
- Self-hosted deployment requires significant DevOps expertise and maintenance effort
- Complex distributed architecture has steeper learning curve than simpler alternatives
- Zilliz Cloud managed version starts at $99/month, higher than some competitors
- Resource requirements can be substantial for small to medium deployments
- Documentation gaps exist for advanced configuration and optimization scenarios
3. Weaviate
Weaviate combines vector search with knowledge graph capabilities, enabling semantic relationships between data objects alongside similarity queries. The platform supports hybrid search out of the box, merging vector similarity, keyword matching, and metadata filters in single queries. Built-in vectorizers from OpenAI, Hugging Face, and Cohere generate embeddings automatically.
Multi-modal support handles text, images, and video within the same database. Weaviate performs 10-nearest-neighbor searches in single-digit milliseconds over millions of items. Vector quantization and compression reduce memory usage significantly while maintaining search accuracy, making it cost-efficient for large deployments.
Pros and Cons
- Combines vector search with knowledge graph capabilities for semantic relationships
- Built-in vectorizers from OpenAI, Hugging Face, and Cohere generate embeddings automatically
- Multi-modal support handles text, images, and video within the same database
- Single-digit millisecond 10-nearest-neighbor searches over millions of items
- Vector quantization and compression reduce memory usage while maintaining accuracy
- GraphQL-based API has a learning curve for teams unfamiliar with the query language
- Built-in vectorizers add latency and cost compared to pre-computed embeddings
- Memory consumption can be high for large datasets without careful tuning
- Self-hosted production deployment requires Kubernetes expertise
- Some advanced features like tenant isolation are cloud-only or enterprise-tier
4. Qdrant
Qdrant is a high-performance vector search engine written in Rust, delivering consistently low latency without garbage collection overhead. The platform delivers 4x higher requests per second than many competitors while maintaining sub-millisecond query times. Discord, Johnson & Johnson, and Perplexity run Qdrant in production.
Payload-based filtering integrates directly into search operations rather than post-processing, supporting complex boolean conditions across multiple fields. Hybrid search combines dense vectors with sparse representations like TF-IDF or BM25 for semantic plus keyword matching. Both REST and gRPC APIs ship with official clients for Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, and Rust.
Pros and Cons
- Rust-based architecture delivers 4x higher RPS than competitors with sub-millisecond latency
- Payload-based filtering integrates directly into search without post-processing overhead
- Hybrid search combines dense vectors with sparse representations like BM25
- Both REST and gRPC APIs with official clients for Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, and Rust
- Open source with generous free tier and straightforward self-hosting options
- Smaller ecosystem and community compared to more established alternatives
- Fewer built-in integrations with ML frameworks and embedding providers
- Enterprise features like RBAC require paid cloud tier
- Less mature tooling for monitoring and observability in production
- Documentation could be more comprehensive for complex deployment scenarios
5. ChromaDB
ChromaDB provides the fastest path from idea to working vector search prototype. The Python API mirrors NumPy’s simplicity, running embedded in applications with zero configuration and no network latency. The 2025 Rust rewrite delivered 4x faster writes and queries compared to the original Python implementation.
Built-in metadata filtering and full-text search eliminate the need for separate tools alongside vector similarity. ChromaDB integrates natively with LangChain and LlamaIndex for rapid AI application development. For datasets under 10 million vectors, performance differences from specialized databases become negligible, making it ideal for MVPs and learning.
Pros and Cons
- Zero configuration embedded mode runs in-process with no network latency
- Python API mirrors NumPy simplicity for fastest path from idea to prototype
- 2025 Rust rewrite delivers 4x faster writes and queries than original implementation
- Native integrations with LangChain and LlamaIndex for rapid AI development
- Built-in metadata filtering and full-text search eliminate need for separate tools
- Not designed for production scale beyond 10 million vectors
- Limited horizontal scaling capabilities for distributed deployments
- Fewer index types and tuning options compared to specialized databases
- Cloud hosting option still maturing with limited enterprise features
- Persistence options less robust than purpose-built production databases
6. pgvector
pgvector transforms PostgreSQL into a vector database through a simple extension, enabling similarity search alongside traditional SQL queries in a single system. Version 0.8.0 delivers up to 9x faster query processing and 100x more relevant results. Instacart migrated from Elasticsearch to pgvector, achieving 80% cost savings and 6% fewer zero-result searches.
For 90% of AI workloads, pgvector eliminates the need for separate vector infrastructure. Vectors live alongside operational data, enabling single-query joins between embeddings and business records with guaranteed ACID consistency. Google Cloud, AWS, and Azure all offer managed PostgreSQL with pgvector support, and the extension runs free under the PostgreSQL license.
Pros and Cons
- Transforms existing PostgreSQL into a vector database with a simple extension install
- Version 0.8.0 delivers up to 9x faster queries and 100x more relevant results
- Vectors live alongside operational data enabling single-query joins with ACID consistency
- Free under PostgreSQL license with managed support from AWS, GCP, and Azure
- Eliminates separate vector infrastructure for 90% of AI workloads
- Performance degrades significantly beyond 500 million vectors
- Fewer specialized index types than purpose-built vector databases
- No built-in support for sparse vectors or hybrid search without extensions
- Memory requirements can be substantial for large HNSW indexes
- Requires PostgreSQL expertise for optimal configuration and tuning
7. MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas Vector Search adds similarity capabilities directly into the document database, storing embeddings alongside operational data without sync overhead. At 15.3 million vectors with 2048 dimensions, the platform maintains 90-95% accuracy with sub-50ms query latency. Atlas Search Nodes allow vector workloads to scale independently from transactional clusters.
The document model stores embeddings within the same records as metadata, eliminating data synchronization complexity. Scalar quantization reduces memory requirements by 75%, while binary quantization cuts them by 97%. Native aggregation pipelines combine vector search with complex transformations in unified queries, and enterprise security features come standard.
Pros and Cons
- Vector search integrates directly with document database, eliminating sync overhead
- Maintains 90-95% accuracy with sub-50ms latency at 15.3 million vectors
- Scalar quantization reduces memory by 75%, binary quantization by 97%
- Atlas Search Nodes scale vector workloads independently from transactional clusters
- Native aggregation pipelines combine vector search with complex transformations
- Vector search is Atlas-only, not available in self-managed MongoDB deployments
- Costs can escalate with dedicated Search Nodes for high-performance workloads
- Vector index building can be slow for very large collections
- Fewer vector-specific optimizations than purpose-built alternatives
- Learning curve for aggregation pipeline syntax with vector operations
8. Redis
Redis delivers sub-millisecond vector search latency that few databases can match, running up to 18x faster than alternatives in single-client benchmarks and 52x faster in multi-client scenarios. Redis 8.0 introduced native vector types, and the April 2025 vector sets feature optimizes real-time similarity queries with reduced memory usage.
The in-memory architecture combines caching, session management, and vector search in one system. Quantization provides 75% memory reduction while maintaining 99.99% accuracy. For datasets under 10 million vectors where latency matters most, Redis excels. The platform returned to open source under AGPL in 2024, with cloud pricing starting at just $5/month.
Pros and Cons
- Sub-millisecond latency runs 18x faster single-client and 52x faster multi-client than alternatives
- Redis 8.0 native vector types and April 2025 vector sets optimize real-time similarity queries
- Combines caching, session management, and vector search in one in-memory system
- Quantization provides 75% memory reduction while maintaining 99.99% accuracy
- Returned to open source under AGPL in 2024 with cloud pricing starting at $5/month
- In-memory architecture requires expensive RAM for large vector datasets
- Best suited for datasets under 10 million vectors where latency is critical
- Vector search features require Redis Stack or Enterprise, not core Redis
- Less mature vector search capabilities compared to dedicated databases
- AGPL license may have implications for some commercial deployments
9. Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch bridges semantic understanding with precise keyword matching, performing up to 12x faster than OpenSearch for vector search operations. The platform integrates with AI frameworks like LangChain and AutoGen for conversational AI patterns, and its built-in ELSER embedding model generates vectors without external services.
The query DSL composes vector search with structured filters and full-text search in ways most vector-first databases cannot easily replicate. Strict data consistency guarantees atomic updates across vector and keyword fields. Organizations running Elasticsearch for search can add AI capabilities without new infrastructure, leveraging existing operational expertise and achieving 10x data growth without architectural changes.
Pros and Cons
- Performs up to 12x faster than OpenSearch for vector search operations
- Query DSL composes vector search with structured filters and full-text in ways others cannot
- Built-in ELSER embedding model generates vectors without external services
- Strict data consistency guarantees atomic updates across vector and keyword fields
- Existing Elasticsearch deployments add AI capabilities without new infrastructure
- Resource-heavy with substantial memory and CPU requirements for vector workloads
- Complex cluster management and tuning required for optimal performance
- Licensing changes created uncertainty, though AGPL option now available
- Vector search features relatively newer compared to established text search
- Cloud pricing at $95/month starting point higher than some alternatives
10. Deep Lake
Deep Lake stores vectors alongside images, videos, audio, PDFs, and structured metadata in a unified multi-modal database built on data lake architecture. Intel, Bayer Radiology, and Yale University use Deep Lake for AI workloads requiring diverse data types. The platform offers sub-second latency while costing significantly less than alternatives through native object storage access.
Every dataset is versioned like Git, enabling rollbacks, branching, and change tracking across training iterations. Deep Lake 4.0 delivers 5x faster installation and 10x faster reads/writes through C++ optimization. Native integrations with LangChain, LlamaIndex, PyTorch, and TensorFlow simplify ML pipeline development. Data stays in your own cloud (S3, GCP, or Azure) with SOC 2 Type II compliance.
Pros and Cons
- Stores vectors alongside images, videos, audio, and PDFs in unified multi-modal database
- Git-like versioning enables rollbacks, branching, and change tracking across iterations
- Deep Lake 4.0 delivers 5x faster installation and 10x faster reads/writes via C++ optimization
- Native integrations with LangChain, LlamaIndex, PyTorch, and TensorFlow
- Data stays in your own cloud storage with SOC 2 Type II compliance
- Enterprise pricing starts at $995/month, significantly higher than alternatives
- Specialized for ML workflows, overkill for simple vector search use cases
- Smaller community and ecosystem compared to more established databases
- Learning curve for data lake concepts if coming from traditional databases
- Query capabilities less flexible than SQL-based alternatives for ad-hoc analysis
Which Database Should You Choose?
For rapid prototyping and learning, ChromaDB or pgvector get you started fastest with minimal setup. If you’re already running PostgreSQL, pgvector adds vector capabilities without new infrastructure. Teams needing enterprise scale with managed operations should evaluate Pinecone for its serverless simplicity or Milvus for self-hosted control.
When sub-millisecond latency matters more than dataset size, Redis delivers unmatched speed for moderate-scale deployments. Organizations working with multi-modal data spanning images, video, and text should consider Deep Lake or Weaviate. For hybrid search combining vectors with full-text and structured queries, Elasticsearch and MongoDB Atlas leverage existing expertise while adding AI capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a vector database and why do I need one for AI?
A vector database stores high-dimensional numerical representations (embeddings) generated by ML models and enables fast similarity search across them. Traditional databases can’t efficiently query these embeddings, making vector databases essential for RAG, semantic search, recommendation systems, and other AI applications that rely on finding similar items.
Can I use PostgreSQL instead of a dedicated vector database?
Yes, pgvector transforms PostgreSQL into a capable vector database suitable for 90% of AI workloads. It’s ideal when you need vectors alongside operational data in unified queries. For datasets exceeding 500 million vectors or requiring specialized features, dedicated vector databases may perform better.
Which vector database is best for production RAG applications?
Pinecone offers the smoothest path to production with managed infrastructure, while Milvus provides more control for self-hosted deployments. Both handle billion-scale vector collections with low latency. Weaviate excels when your RAG pipeline needs hybrid search combining semantic and keyword matching.
How much do vector databases cost?
Most vector databases offer free tiers sufficient for prototyping. Production costs vary by scale: Pinecone starts at $50/month, Weaviate at $45/month, and Redis at just $5/month. Open-source options like Milvus, Qdrant, ChromaDB, and pgvector run free if you self-host, though infrastructure costs apply.
What’s the difference between in-memory and disk-based vector databases?
In-memory databases like Redis deliver sub-millisecond latency but require expensive RAM for large datasets. Disk-based systems like Milvus and pgvector cost less per vector but trade some speed. Many databases now offer hybrid approaches with intelligent caching, balancing cost and performance based on access patterns.














