Partnerships
Harvey Partners with Djøf Forlag to Add Danish Legal Sources

Harvey announced on November 11, 2026, a partnership with Danish legal publisher Djøf Forlag to add licensed Danish legislation, executive orders and preparatory works to its legal AI platform, giving Jurabibliotek licensees a way to research and draft from those materials alongside their own documents.
Jurabibliotek’s legislative content is scheduled to become available in Harvey at the start of 2027, with no additional charge. Access requires a license to Djøf Forlag’s digital platform. The licensed collection will sit alongside Danish public sources already available in Harvey.
Connecting Statutes, Regulations and Legislative Intent
The collection covers consolidated acts, the executive orders issued under them, amendments and preparatory documents. Lawyers will be able to move between a statutory provision, the regulations that implement it and material showing what the legislature intended, with each answer citing its source.
Harvey’s examples include checking what preparatory works said when a provision was introduced, following an act to its implementing executive orders, and drafting Danish-law advice from the licensed sources together with a firm’s prior work. The sequence connects the text of the law with both its implementation and the reasoning behind its introduction.
The content can be used in Harvey Assistant, Agents, Vault, Workflows and the Word Add-in, next to a team’s own notes, prior advice and matter documents. That puts the licensed sources into the same product surfaces used for drafting and review, rather than limiting their use to a separate research collection.
Publisher History and Customer Use
Djøf Forlag Digital Director Bjarke Madsen said the publisher has supplied Danish legal sources for more than 65 years, first through books and more recently through Danish legislation on Jurabibliotek, and that customer demand for making those sources available in AI-powered legal technology systems motivated the Harvey partnership.
The agreement follows Harvey’s data partnership with Gyldendal Rettsdata in Norway. It also builds on Harvey’s work with Danish firms including Kromann Reumert, which went live with Harvey across the firm in 2026 to scale research, drafting and review.
At Accura, which uses Harvey as its primary legal AI tool, Executive AI Officer and Head of AI Christian Høyer Ørum described a regulatory-advice process that starts with the act, checks executive orders and returns to preparatory works when interpretation matters. That process connects the collection’s different document types to a single regulatory question.
Ørum said the integration will let Accura perform those steps alongside its notes and prior advice, in the tool it already uses to draft and review, and will make the work “faster and more consistent.”
For Danish firms, the practical significance is the connection between licensed authority and internal work product. Because each answer cites its source, the integration preserves a route from an AI-assisted draft back to the act, executive order or preparatory document supporting it, keeping legal verification attached to the research and drafting process.












